Weighted Category Average

The universe begins with Indian open-ended direct mutual fund schemes. Eligible funds must have a meaningful performance history, transparent NAV reporting, and regular portfolio disclosure. We focus on equity-oriented categories suited to high-growth objectives. such as large-cap, flexi/multi-cap, and mid/small-cap—while allowing limited stabilizers (cash / short-duration / high-quality debt) only when they improve overall portfolio resilience. To keep the basket implementable for everyday investors, we exclude funds with persistent style drift, opaque mandates, or liquidity constraints, and we avoid over-reliance on narrow sector/thematic exposure. The resulting universe is mapped to underlying risk drivers (volatility, drawdown behavior, and correlation) so each fund’s role in diversification is measurable before selection.

Research combines quantitative fund analytics with portfolio-construction checks. We evaluate rolling returns across market regimes, downside capture, maximum drawdown, and consistency versus category peers. Risk is modeled through volatility, correlation structure, and stress-period behavior, alongside practical attributes like expense ratio and concentration. Our approach as data-driven and AI-assisted, using models to forecast risk and reward and to analyze baskets alongside expert selection. These signals are translated into forward-looking expectations and then tested for robustness, so the basket does not depend on a single style (growth/value), market-cap bucket, or factor regime. Scenario checks (risk-on vs risk-off) and overlap analysis help ensure the final portfolio is diversified rather than a collection of similar funds.

Constituents are screened in three layers. (1) Eligibility: operationally available schemes with adequate history, regular disclosure, and investability through the platform. (2) Quality &amp; risk: we remove funds with persistent peer underperformance, unusually deep drawdowns for their category, unstable risk profiles, or excessive concentration/turnover that can amplify downside. (3) Portfolio fit: each remaining fund is scored on expected contribution to return, impact on portfolio risk, and diversification benefit (how much it reduces reliance on any single driver). Funds with high holding overlap are penalized so the basket can combine a core allocation (broad-market equity funds) with satellite exposures (select mid/small or specialized styles) only when they improve the total risk/return trade-off. The final list is kept intentionally compact to support clean execution and monitoring.

Weights are determined using a constrained optimization framework designed for aggressive growth with diversification controls. Inputs include expected return, expected risk, and cross-fund correlations from the research layer. Constraints limit concentration in any single scheme and ensure exposure is spread across complementary equity categories, while guardrails reduce unintended bets from overlap and correlated style tilts. The basket is rebalanced on a semi-annual cadence (every 6 months), aligning the portfolio back to target weights while aiming to avoid unnecessary churn. After optimization, a validation step checks stress behavior (drawdowns and downside capture) and confirms that no single theme dominates the outcome. This keeps the portfolio aligned to its stated objective: higher-return potential for investors who can tolerate higher volatility and interim drawdowns.

This smallcase will be rebalanced on an as-needed basis

Wright Aggressive Asset Allocation

Compare with 101st-250th market cap stocks

Compare with 251st-350th market cap stocks

High-growth mutual fund basket for high risk investors seeking long-term capital growth.

Wright Aggressive Asset Allocation

Overview

Funds & Weights